Goodbye Pine Creek




We had been waiting to find out what would happen with the Pine Creek permit, and when the EPA signaled its support for this mine last month, we responded loudly.

West Virginia coal miner’s widow Lorelei Scarbro and leader with the Alliance for Appalachia, who has met numerous times with the EPA, wrote to Lisa Jackson to express the disappointment felt by many mountain-community members about this news.

The Pine Creek permit was issued despite a history of serious flooding in 1996 and 2004, attributed by local residents to strip mining. The floods prompted the late Senator Robert C. Byrd to request funding from the Obama Administration for flood control along Island Creek, noting that the area had been impacted by six major floods over the span of thirty years, and that the floods had resulted in “significant loss of life and property damage.”

According to the EPA: The company agreed to meet all conditions presented by the Agency.

Pine Creek is the litmus test for the EPA’s new approach to mountaintop removal mining permits in Appalachia – and we can see that they are happy to see this devastating practice continue.

Simply put, if the EPA’s “new approach” allows mountains to be destroyed and valleys to be filled, the EPA is not doing its job to protect our mountains, communities and environment.

We need your help to stop the further degradation of the Appalachian Mountains, the contamination of precious streams and drinking water and the exacerbation of the climate crisis.

Tell the EPA to uphold the Clean Water Act and protect Americans' health by rejecting all new mountaintop removal mining permints

 

 

Learn More

From the cradle to the grave, coal is a risky business. Each stage in the life cycle of coal– extraction, transportation and combustion–presents increasing health, environmental, reputational, legislative and financial risks.
Ambre Energy and Peabody Energy are leading the push for west coast export terminals that would open the floodgates for a new coal market in Asia. Advocates for clean energy, the environment, and public health and safety have coalesced to oppose these ports on the beautiful Pacific Northwest coastline.